Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts

Friday, January 7, 2011

TAXIDERMIA Gets Under Your Skin

(No pun intended)
Conversely, it also makes you want to throw up your insides.

Ryan and I had read some reviews on Netflix before renting this, and were forewarned: this is the grossest move you will ever see. It wasn't a horror film (at least, it wasn't marketed as that, but I'm sure one could argue.) The Hungarian film follows the legacy of three males: father, son, and grandson, chronologically. That's about the only part of the story that is obvious and somewhat makes sense. Not to say that the oddities this movie displays are neither entertaining nor meaningful. It's just that there aren't many films with the - pardon my french, but I feel it's a good analogy given the source material - balls to tell a dramatic story in such an utterly grotesque and revealing way.

Without going into too much detail (the details are better observed firsthand, as they are quite unbelievable), the three generations of men are portrayed within their own acts, which in turn have their own theme. This is not explicitly said, yet it is apparent once we get into the meat of the story. And yes, meat is at the heart of this tale in more ways than one.

Our first protagonist, Morosgoványi Vendel, is who we open on, in the midst of some literal playing with fire. It is clear from the uncomfortable close-ups of flame-on-skin that this is not just a game, but a sexual obsession. And so, as Morosgoványi's tale goes on, we see that much of his life on a drab, nondescript farm is spent pining over the sins of the flesh - both animate and inanimate. Quick flashes of females' wet skin, inter-cut with his lieutenant's musings on female anatomy set the tone. Poor Vengel is subservient to this family, and as a result tries to escape through his fantasies; one of which includes a pig.

The cinematography is one of the best qualities of this film, in that it really takes you up close and personal. You flinch at the sight of fire near skin, a pig is butchered too close for comfort, and at one point in the film, you literally are inside the character, mirroring the feeling of being gutted. The shots are always interesting and meticulously composed, and the director, György Pálfi, does not shy from forcing you to take in the scene fully before he allows you to look away.



Next to the lustful context of Vengel's tale, the remaining two acts are centered upon two other vices: gluttony and vanity, though one is more obvious than the other. Vengel's illegitimate child, Kálmán, raised by the family his father served, becomes a speed-eater, and we are forced to experience these gag-inducing moments of slurping and subsequent hurling right from the get-go. Pálfi wastes no time.

After a life of humiliation and unsuccessful attempts at being speed-eater champion of the world, Kálmán resorts to piling all his feelings of inadequacy onto his comparably smaller, rail-thin son, Lajoska. Instead of doting on his only child, who runs a seemingly successful yet incredibly creepy Taxidermy business, he fawns on his over-fed cats and boasts about his days of gorging glory. Lajoska, much like his long-dead grandfather, is a servant and tied inextricably to his duties of feeding and cleaning his now obese father, who seems content to be so. We know that this story cannot have a happy ending, but we wish it did. The finale is a most foul one indeed, but if you can stomach the gore and see the deeper meaning, it is both a haunting and melancholy Shakespearean end to a family legacy.

Friday, March 5, 2010

Alice For Reals

Just found this gem on my morning blog surf: the world's 1st screen adaptation of "Alice in Wonderland".....over 100 years ago!

This beautiful 35mm B&W was shot only 8 years after the birth of motion picture technology. In the wake of the new Burton "Alice," this is certainly a breath of fresh air. They just don't make 'em like they used to.



Read all about it at BFI, or take a peek at this snippet from YouTube:
"The first-ever film version of Lewis Carroll's tale has recently been restored by the BFI National Archive from severely damaged materials. Made just 37 years after Lewis Carroll wrote his novel and eight years after the birth of cinema, the adaptation was directed by Cecil Hepworth and Percy Stow, and was based on Sir John Tenniel's original illustrations....

....With a running time of just 12 minutes (8 of which survive), Alice in Wonderland was the longest film produced in England at that time. Film archivists have been able to restore the film's original colours for the first time in over 100 years.
"

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Oscar Nom Nom Noms

Here they are: my own deliciously juicy tidbits on the Oscar nominations this year.

I haven't seen all the films that were nominated, or those that should have been, so it's with some reluctance that I make a fuss over any of this. But I will put forth my opinion anyhow, since everyone else is doing it, and if you don't want to read it you can just leave this blog, go find some smug, self-proclaimed film buff's nifty list and proceed to silently judge them.

DISCLAIMER: I have not, nor have I ever claimed I am a film buff.

PHEW. My conscience is cleared.

My first question would be, where is the film Moon? First time director, Duncan Jones, did a fine job with this 2001-esque story. The space sets look amazing. Mostly because
, I would think, they are ACTUAL sets. Really conveyed the eeriness and isolation of being alone on a distant planet. This should have at least been given a nod for director or screenplay.

And far more perplexing is the fact that Sam Rockwell wasn't nominated for Best Actor. He basically carried the film himself! (And if you've seen it, you know that means much more than what it appears.)

And, I gotta say it...The Limits of Control got no love. Don't even get me started.

Also Somers Town (Shane Meadows).....Bad Lieutenant (Wernor Herzog)....Drag Me to Hell (Sam Raimi)....? Really, nothin........?

Sigh.

"
Best Picture"
Couple things wrong with this picture...first of all, there are 10 nominees. That's a lot. Also, Avatar is on the list...now here's the dilemma. I haven't seen Avatar (I have no desire to, really - don't shoot me, I'm not pretentious, I'm just choosy with spending my livelihood money), but the last time I checked it was pretty much animated.

The rule, so I've heard, is that you need at least 75% animation in your film to qualify as an "Animated Picture." Maybe that's not the case with Avatar. OR perhaps it isn't...perhaps they just wanted to nominate Avatar because it is the highest grossing film, like, ever, yada yada, and James Cameron totally created a world of his own and blew our 2D minds with flying jellyfish and he must truly be a great director to like, even imagine this. (I mean, my sister draws giant mechanical, flying sea creatures, and it didn't cost her millions and a few years of her life, but I digress...)

To top it off, Up was also listed under Best Picture. Which was, yes, a good film. Perhaps not just for the graphics, but for the story and how it was executed.

IF that were the case...then why is there an "Best Animated Picture" category as well? Is that just for the mastery of the particular craft of animation, or for story, or both? And if so, how is that different from "Best Picture"? In my opinion, a good film should have both. So why pigeonhole animated films into their own category when they essentially achieve the same goals?

Lest we forget that once upon the time Beauty and the Beast was nominated in the "Best [not Animated] Picture" category...

"Best Actor"
Jeff Bridges. I like him. Not enough to see him play a drunk country musician...but I have faith. Morgan Freeman again, seriously? Did they even bother to watch him in the movie this time?

"Best Supporting Actor"
I don't even care about the others (though I have a little crush on Christopher Plummer..); maybe it's easy to play a criminal when it's a Nazi, but Christoph Waltz' villain in Inglorious Basterds made me pee my pants.

"Best Actress"
They nominated Penelope Cruz for - no, not Broken Embraces - but...Nine. WTF.

"Animated Feature Film"
WHERE THE HELL IS PONYO YOU SHITHEADS!? Honestly, I could cry. Did they forget about Miyazaki's masterpiece? Beautiful illustrations, GREAT English casting, a classic fairtytale story - no good or evil, even - just the circumstances of two kids. Well one fish, who dreams of living on land, and one kid, who wants to help her. Maybe the simple plot served as the excuse for its lack of Academy appeal.

Ohhhh I forgot, movies have to have things that EXPLODE and make REALLY LOUD ANNOYING NOISES and end in an EPIC BATTLES in order to gain mass appeal from younger audiences. ::rolls eyes::

Though, I admit, I'm still torn on this list. Remember I said before that this category needn't exist? It's because these ARE the best pictures of the year, by far.

I was hesitant to see The Princess and the Frog as I've lost my loyalty to Disney gradually over the years. I was also a Little Mermaid fanatic, and I was afraid of wounding my inner child further. I will say this: they have redeemed themselves in the world of cel animation. And the music (though Randy Newman annoys the crap out of me) was fully entertaining. That art deco scene was a pleasant surprise.



The Fantastic Mr. Fox is so fun to watch. Yes, George Clooney was basically playing himself. And yes it's a Wes Anderson film; but boo to all the naysayers. He could be an asshole for all I know, but as a director, Anderson did some kick-ass stop motion, and I laughed wholeheartedly through its entirety. Haven't experienced a movie like this since Wallace & Gromit...

(....which is also on the list for Animated Shorts! When the hell did that come out and why haven't I seen it!?)

Remember as a kid how some movies used to give you the creeps? Make you afraid that something would grab you in the dark, or that your parents would suddenly disappear...and you would DIE? Coraline brings those scary, yet necessary feelings back. I felt like a kid again, and I'm sure the whimpering children next to me enjoyed it as well ("Oh no Coraline, don't go in there!!!" ::Screams::)

Up. My friend Josh puts it perfectly: the first 10 minutes of the film are probably the best moments of drama written in history. The rest was a rollicking fun (albeit predictable) Disney movie. Not too shabby.

"Directing"
If Cameron wins, you can count me out of next year's Oscars. He's an asshole. Don't believe me? Remember when he won for Titanic? ....Yeah.

"Writing" (Original Screenplay)
I think Quentin really deserves this one. Killing Nazis hasn't been this good since Indiana Jones.

Well, my rant here is done.

So, after all that, will I be watching the Oscars? Well, since I don't have cable at home, no. Unless there are a generous few willing to let me loll around in my PJs for 5 hours whilst eating Pringles.

(Read all about my Oscar ritual, which has been seriously disrupted by the bummer of reality, here.)
Blog Widget by LinkWithin